I’m back from some vacation where I read Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers on the beach at our cottage (along with some very funny David Sedaris).
Even if you haven’t read Outliers yet you probably know that it sets out to dispel myths that intelligence or innate ability are the primary predictors of success. Instead, Gladwell summarizes research and provides examples to show that it is hours and hours of practice (10,000 to be exact) and a “practical intelligence” (similar in concept to emotional intelligence) acquired through experience that are the real determinants of success.
Gladwell covers similar territory (and draws on the same research) as Geoff Colvin’s Talent is Overrated: What Really Separates world Class Performers from Everybody Else, another excellent book that elaborates on an article Colvin wrote for Fortune magazine a few years ago: “What it Takes To Be Great”.
Both books debunk the assumption that “gifted” skill and great performance comes from innate talent, personal traits or hard wired competencies and ability. The research Galdwell and Colvin draw on is impressive. Both point to the extensive work of K. Anders Ericsson at Florida State University. Ericsson has conducted years of rock solid research on the role of “deliberate practice” in the acquisition of expert performance. If you like to seek out source research as I do, then you’ll enjoy Ericsson’s (and others) impressive work that has been collected in the Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Here is an earlier (and less hefty) review on some of the same research: “Deliberate practice” in the acquisition of expert performance.
At the core of these works is the concept of “deliberate practice” over longs periods of time (up to ten years). While impossible to boil down the theory into a few points, here it is…uh…boiled down into a few points. Highly skilled performance in all aspects of life and work can be developed by the rough equivalent of 10,000 hours (10 years or so) of increasing specific, targeted and mindful practice in a domain of expertise. The practice must be:
- Specific & technique-oriented
- Self regulated
- Involve high-repetition
- Paired with immediate feedback on results
- Isn’t necessarily “fun”, (in fact can be grueling hard work)
“Deliberate practice is activity designed specifically to improve performance, often with a teacher’s help; it can be repeated a lot; feedback on results is continuously available; it’s highly demanding mentally, whether the activity is purely intellectual, such as chess or business-related activities, or heavily physical, such as sports; and it isn’t much fun.
From: Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else .
Where Gladwell and Colvin focus on how an individual (you!) can use deliberate practice to improve and achieve the success you want, Learning Professionals should be thinking about how to use the ideas to help others develop and grow the expertise needed by the organizations we support. Ericsson has something to say here as well, having recently published a new book on how to design learning environments to develop and measure expertise– Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments. In a time when learning/instructional design has become generalized and de-professionalized to the point of non-existence, it’s refreshing to see a serious treatment that moves the profession forward.
Using “Deliberate Practice” to Improve Workplace Performance
Here are 10 ideas that just scratch the surface on how Learning Professionals can use “deliberate practice” to improve workplace skill and performance.
- Move from “mastery learning” to designing practice with feedback over longer periods of time (from learning events to a learning process). Deliberate Practice differs from the concept of ‘Mastery Learning” at the heart of much instructional design. Mastery learning assumes a skill is perfected (or at least brought to a defined standard) in a fairly short period of time often within the scope of a single course. The complex professional skills of modern knowledge workers and managers demand a stronger focus on long term practice and feedback and building learning around long term objectives.
- Develop the person. Time, practice and individualized feedback imply a long term focus on individuals rather than on jobs or roles.
- Informal learning efforts like action learning, coaching and are cognitive apprenticeships are critical but they must be focused on practice and immediate feedback and extend over long periods of time.
- Relevant, frequent and varied practice must be the dominant and most important element in all formal training programs.
- Practice opportunities must extend far beyond initial training programs, to allow people to hone their skills through experimentation with immediate feedback.
- Create practice sandboxes and simulation centres for key organizational skills where people can practice their skills and experience immediate feedback in safe environment.
- Design visual feedback directly into jobs so professional can immediately see the results of their work. In this way working IS deliberate practice.
- Turn training events into the first step of a learning journey that will continue to provide opportunities to practice and refine skills throughout a career.
- Identify the interests and strengths of people nurture them through opportunities for deliberate practice. Provide resources and support that encourage early effort and achievement.
- Ensure social media environments provide opportunities for coaching and mindful reflection on performance.